its not that i think that anyone should harm an animal , i just think that everyone ive ever met who is devoutly into animal rights is a lunatic. its their religion. they also dont usually care much for humans.
its so easy to care more about animals than about people. animals are much less complicated than humans. the time being spent worrying about animals could be spent curing world (people) hunger or promoting world peace.
cruelty-free doesnt mean a the factory making clinique wasnt harassed by their employers it just means an animal wasnt. big whoop. for arguments sake it would be nice if both werent harmed but peta doesnt think so. people dont rate with peta. anyway all cosmetic ingredients have been tested on humans at some point, it just means that the whole product hasnt been tested on animals .
animal rights activists care little about homeless people . now a homeless cat... thats another thing.
3 comments:
The Nazis were very animal-friendly..
yes , this is what i always think of when i think of peta.
Another interesting observation is that all those animal rights activists don't actually know anything about animals. They don't know what the animal's natural habitat is like, what they eat, what is their normal behavior and how to spot if the animal is not being taken care of properly.
We had a reptile guy come to college and bring snakes, lizards and a croc. I'm there playing with the snakes and one of my friends, one of those peta people, walks buy. I call her over and she just runs off. Later, she tells me sorry for ignoring me but looking at the croc who was in a small enclosure and not moving much just made her want to cry. Sweety, the size of a croc's natural habitat is inversely proportional to its food supply and they spend most of their time floating in the water and it's cold blooded and it was obviously fed before being brought to a college.
Post a Comment